Home safety in inner cities: prevalence and feasibility of home safety-product use in inner-city housing.

OBJECTIVES: Residential injuries cause significant morbidity and mortality in infants and young children. The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends initiating injury-prevention counseling during health supervision visits in the first 6 months of life. The objectives of this study were to describe and compare self-reported and observed home safety practices in urban, low-income families who were expecting or had a child <12 months old and to assess the feasibility of using safety products depending on the design and repair of urban homes. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: Women who were pregnant or had an infant <12 months old and who were enrolled in East Baltimore's Healthy Start home-visiting program were eligible for the study. For this pilot project, we used a prospective predesign/postdesign. Maternal self-report and investigator home observations documented the use of working smoke alarms on each level of the home, stair gates or doors blocking the top and bottom of all staircases, adult medication storage in locked cabinets, and the environmental feasibility of safety-product use. RESULTS: Home safety practices were higher by maternal self-report than by investigator observation. Fifty-five percent of families who reported a working smoke alarm on every level of the home had nonworking or absent smoke alarms noted during investigator observation. Of assessed staircases, 67% could not accommodate a wall-mounted gate at the top of the stairs, and 38% could not accommodate a pressure-mounted gate at the bottom of the stairs. Although most families reported locked storage of medications, 77% had unlocked medication storage documented during home observation. CONCLUSIONS: In this sample of urban families, implementation of American Academy of Pediatrics-recommended safety practices is low. The structural design of urban homes may be a significant barrier to home safety-product use. The American Academy of Pediatrics Injury Prevention Program sheets, manufacturers of safety products, and legislators need to address injury-prevention issues unique to urban, low-income families.

Advance care planning and hospital in the nursing home.

BACKGROUND: the number of nursing home residents (NHRs) in hospital is increasing although hospital admission may be deleterious to their health. OBJECTIVE: to evaluate a system of educating residents, their families, staff and general practitioners about outcomes of dementia, advance care planning (ACP) and hospital in the home. METHODS: we employed one clinical nurse consultant, who utilised the 'Let Me Decide' Advance Care Directive. The intervention area consisted of two hospitals and the 21 nursing homes (NHs) around them compared with another, geographically separate, hospital and the 13 homes around it. We conducted a controlled evaluation monitoring emergency admissions to hospital. RESULTS: emergency calls to the ambulance service from intervention NHs decreased (intervention versus control; -1 versus +21%; P = 0.0019). The risk of a resident being in an intervention hospital bed for a day compared with in a control hospital bed, per NH bed, fell by a quarter from being initially similar [Relative Risk (RR) = 1.01; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.98-1.04; P = 0.442] to being lower (RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.72-0.77; P<0.0001). There was no significant change in mortality in the intervention homes, but in the control homes mortality rose in the third year to be 11.2 per 100 beds higher than in the intervention area (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: ACP and hospital in the home can result in decreased hospital admission and mortality of NHRs.